Mostly semantics

Posted by Jim V on February 23, 2006 at 12:32:26:

In Reply to: Re: Indiana Foreclosure posted by Steele in Minnesota on February 23, 2006 at 07:01:39:

Steele,

I think it's mostly semantics, because I don't really see how it's a redemption if the sheriff's sale hasn't happened yet. There is a distinct reinstatement period, so maybe they just needed something different to call the time period before the sheriff's sale.
Indiana Code 32-29-7-7

Follow Ups:

• Re: I can settle this - Irwin 07:18:31 02/24/06 (0)

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: 
: Steele,

: I think it's mostly semantics, because I don't really see how it's a redemption if the sheriff's sale hasn't happened yet.  There is a distinct reinstatement period, so maybe they just needed something different to call the time period before the sheriff's sale.
: Indiana Code 32-29-7-7


Optional Link URL : 
Link Title        : 
Optional Image URL: 

    

    
    
    
   

Foreclosures Section

Foreclosure Help

Foreclosure Investing

Real Estate Articles

Our Site Resources

Discussion Archives