Mostly semantics
Posted by Jim V on February 23, 2006 at 12:32:26:
In Reply to: Re: Indiana Foreclosure posted by Steele in Minnesota on February 23, 2006 at 07:01:39:
Steele,
I think it's mostly semantics, because I don't really see how it's a redemption if the sheriff's sale hasn't happened yet. There is a distinct reinstatement period, so maybe they just needed something different to call the time period before the sheriff's sale.Indiana Code 32-29-7-7
- Re: I can settle this - Irwin 07:18:31 02/24/06
(0)
