Is there any difference in treatment of DJ (pursue v not) if the loan is investment v owner ocupied?.
I stress loan not property because many of them were never intended for owner ocupied only to get favorable terms of loan(better %,RE tax ,lower ins rate) and nobody really enforced this important condition.So far i hear that many of them walk away with no deficiency any sort ,no 1099 after staffing their pockets with multiplied refi cash out money and walking away or short selling after sucking out all equity.
I disclosed on loan aplication rental purpose only to get stuck with higher interest, RE tax and ins
My loan(with 30% down which i will never see again) will adjust next year ,rent will not cover the carring cost anymore ,am ready for the worst .
In the best scenario i will be in best position getting 1099 for forgiven debt(payable for rental) if DJ is not pursue.
Am i missing something here?
Property is in Chicago.
120k First loan AHMSI
90K HELOC for gut rehab
rest for rehab from saving
CMV 130K if lucky to sell