Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied)
November 02, 2009 08:22PM
Deficiencies aren't often pursued because it doesn't make much financial sense for the lender unless the deficiency is granted as part of the foreclosure process. I believe in most states it's a distinct action after the foreclosure that will cost the lender more money.

So, owner occupant or not, deficiencies aren't often pursued unless the borrower has significant other assets. Lenders are also very aware that unpayable debts can be discharged through bankruptcy.
Subject Author Views Posted
Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) robik1 119 October 31, 2009 10:22PM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) Jim V 65 November 02, 2009 08:22PM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) robik1 67 November 03, 2009 10:19PM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) Jim V 59 November 04, 2009 01:20AM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) robik1 76 November 04, 2009 11:20PM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) Jim V 61 November 05, 2009 01:52AM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) robik1 44 November 07, 2009 09:20AM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) steele in minnesota 43 November 07, 2009 09:30AM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) robik1 45 November 07, 2009 02:22PM
Re: Deficiency Judgment(rental v owner ocupied) steele in minnesota 56 November 07, 2009 03:18PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Message: